{"id":"W205483883","doi":"","title":"Subdirectly Irreducible Squags of Cardinality 3n.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"graph theory and CDMA systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cardinality (data modeling); Mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002441407,0.0001298598,0.000259721,0.00006554497,0.00004008065,0.00001331136,0.0001723206,0.00007782367,0.0001669064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002025795,0.0001367997,0.0001074535,0.0002918648,0.00004228536,0.00009539619,0.00001696247,0.0001135211,0.0001072717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002894441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003168564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003733584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001776096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991941,0.00005866647,0.0002408219,0.000140499,0.0001520173,0.0002138814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994236,0.00005092333,0.00003516896,0.0003778527,0.00004094664,0.00007148075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001463038,0.0002214016,0.01389332,0.0004673709,0.0002597552,0.00002064086,0.001936795,0.0007275252,0.01248847,0.9425586,0.0241852,0.003226286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003455135,0.000353881,0.02523256,0.0003148705,0.0001838181,0.00006754559,0.0007904902,0.0112737,0.1884706,0.7220647,0.04610717,0.001685507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9393197,0.001679447,0.000007914877,0.00001312137,0.002528131,0.00009992286,0.000006728012,0.000222042,0.05612301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995964,0.00003184622,0.00001692985,0.000005629509,0.00001044144,0.00001315795,0.000001936552,0.00002359139,0.0003000615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2204939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.557853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01364674758501507,"score_gpt":0.1969531571632489,"score_spread":0.1833064095782339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}