{"id":"W2054894396","doi":"10.1080/00220388.2010.514331","title":"Against Excessive Rhetoric in Impact Assessment: Overstating the Case for Randomised Controlled Experiments","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Development Studies","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Link Foundation","keywords":"Causation; Causal inference; Argument (complex analysis); Impact evaluation; Impact assessment; Rhetoric; Inference; Randomized experiment; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Economics; Medicine; Law; Econometrics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8243429,0.003094659,0.01050427,0.01078689,0.007883517,0.02277412,0.01246877,0.04165025,0.005491246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8843158,0.003095283,0.005676751,0.006764944,0.1274338,0.04345642,0.02020809,0.05997289,0.002451534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01665956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01787809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00302579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002324478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.121374,0.7528351,0.03066612,0.01783315,0.07512733,0.002164339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.03552245,0.9211673,0.01358758,0.01747164,0.01121821,0.00103289],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001360813,0.00007385761,0.001123451,0.005010744,0.001105626,0.0003372894,0.007882278,0.001605536,0.0002790873,0.9081871,0.02524885,0.04778549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001207036,0.000265206,0.0003856258,0.008762814,0.0005045034,0.0002500306,0.001003196,0.005296919,0.0006444012,0.9380173,0.04348519,0.0001778493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004110414,0.02842524,0.1584567,0.7758827,0.01397916,0.0008500377,0.0001388282,0.0002760916,0.01788082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3467751,0.0102502,0.2010474,0.4104373,0.02259069,0.005869116,0.00006395529,0.0005127426,0.002453459],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1756571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2166165,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3628150657639925,"score_gpt":0.5344587604187655,"score_spread":0.171643694654773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}