{"id":"W2054961538","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.023","title":"An approach for predicting groundwater recharge in mountainous watersheds","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Water Network","keywords":"Groundwater recharge; Hydrology (agriculture); Groundwater; Geology; Aquifer; Depression-focused recharge; Snowmelt; Groundwater flow; MODFLOW; Groundwater model; Evapotranspiration; Watershed; Streamflow; Drainage basin; Geomorphology; Geography; Snow","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006044318,0.0001039365,0.0002491398,0.0001216704,0.00009452443,0.00001791638,0.0002488288,0.0001142015,0.0001772585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001953226,0.00007465717,0.00007305735,0.00006875574,0.00006405202,0.0003264651,0.000005451662,0.0002280249,0.000005647948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009234688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004193933,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003256836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006350932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998924,0.00007403182,0.0003854462,0.0001476203,0.0001304287,0.0003384544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995555,0.00004785618,0.0001368924,0.0001075646,0.00004984885,0.0001023553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002684853,0.00008876489,0.9914712,0.00001912753,0.00001878303,0.0001074947,0.000924329,0.004631482,0.001490343,0.000002557023,0.0001004558,0.0008770284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00531546,0.005666441,0.7802625,0.00002628802,0.00006939515,0.01718214,0.0009705672,0.173277,0.00875758,0.002715738,0.005098804,0.0006580769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966011,0.0001323958,0.001727561,0.0001048946,0.0002112157,0.00008709235,0.000005781343,0.000008423317,0.001121555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961386,0.00002670882,0.003171629,0.0001875476,0.0003307818,0.000001119858,0.00004908222,0.00000396574,0.00009058945],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2112087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3044431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01979201622040741,"score_gpt":0.2219955489573951,"score_spread":0.2022035327369877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}