{"id":"W2054970340","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12332","title":"Effects of riparian forest harvest on streams: a meta‐analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"STREAMS; Riparian zone; Environmental science; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Ecosystem; Riparian forest; Habitat; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01399749,0.002855264,0.01007367,0.003812512,0.0006845213,0.003457778,0.002681447,0.002285796,0.004757642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02484614,0.00129854,0.03199641,0.004841234,0.0008761929,0.00179034,0.00153962,0.002206176,0.0004590932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001408554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00168626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006764671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01082985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909142,0.004788072,0.001752326,0.001624014,0.0005927441,0.0003286955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754758,0.01928994,0.002304391,0.001413547,0.00106806,0.0004481775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001438041,0.00002511396,0.01392144,0.0406918,0.9385678,0.0001946353,0.00005424134,0.0006904791,0.0003340928,0.000130131,0.0005767827,0.003375469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003021102,0.0001638839,0.009088007,0.002911281,0.9855912,0.00008247496,0.00004426066,0.0003948714,0.0002121959,0.0003619742,0.0008262604,0.00002162483],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06379155,0.9241275,0.005380225,0.00101016,0.0006857848,0.0003714726,0.003378781,0.000271166,0.0009834107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8659691,0.1245275,0.00466628,0.001149661,0.0003145658,0.0007125668,0.001865503,0.0001303685,0.0006645214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01399749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0740267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006817721051018279,"score_gpt":0.2082046093801536,"score_spread":0.2013868883291353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}