{"id":"W2055061566","doi":"10.3182/20090630-4-es-2003.00115","title":"Optimal reconfigurable control allocation design based on reliability analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IFAC Proceedings Volumes","topic":"Fault Detection and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Control reconfiguration; Reliability (semiconductor); Control (management); Computer science; Reliability engineering; Inverse; Point (geometry); Fault (geology); Engineering; Mathematical optimization; Control theory (sociology); Control engineering; Mathematics; Embedded system; Power (physics); Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004718555,0.000675,0.0005821996,0.0006670986,0.0003553571,0.000708152,0.0008606821,0.0003778693,0.00227057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001281752,0.0003401116,0.0003954249,0.0002861955,0.000372049,0.0005378738,0.0003986009,0.0004106616,0.0002463803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005015502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006960329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001646316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002269178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996958,0.00005861078,0.00001356613,0.00006531188,0.00008564699,0.00008107332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999529,0.0001872105,0.00008428836,0.00006109384,0.0001207442,0.00001770648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001785443,0.00004022014,0.0002390819,0.00007462927,0.00003421962,0.00007463191,0.00003883697,0.9029396,0.01682214,0.01266234,0.0005982816,0.06629759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001267036,0.00005682842,0.0001223551,0.000005170052,0.00001461634,0.0000235471,0.000007160294,0.9939309,0.002356476,0.003211167,0.0002534748,0.000005620608],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03841091,0.0001981876,0.9546501,0.00009713791,0.00004363318,0.00004523342,0.00002085655,0.0004556839,0.006078179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9386327,0.00008422766,0.05965262,0.00004110683,0.00002259838,0.00005916426,0.00002175133,0.00005285818,0.00143303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00227057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007595837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007487058171779428,"score_gpt":0.2061509894837512,"score_spread":0.1986639313119718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}