{"id":"W2055061566","doi":"10.3182/20090630-4-es-2003.00115","title":"Optimal reconfigurable control allocation design based on reliability analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IFAC Proceedings Volumes","topic":"Fault Detection and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Control reconfiguration; Reliability (semiconductor); Control (management); Computer science; Reliability engineering; Inverse; Point (geometry); Fault (geology); Engineering; Mathematical optimization; Control theory (sociology); Control engineering; Mathematics; Embedded system; Power (physics); Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004914736,0.000205794,0.0003421881,0.000257809,0.00009782499,0.0001324261,0.0001452208,0.000131661,0.00009034489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001250253,0.0002025585,0.0001662162,0.0006362185,0.0000179089,0.0002124227,0.000001323757,0.000166977,0.0000761708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001504009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000170609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002271137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001619965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988102,0.00001791015,0.0003281477,0.000306412,0.0002434647,0.0002939206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994578,0.000053751,0.00006600765,0.0001595067,0.0001547334,0.0001081395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001296079,0.00005047698,0.0009934078,0.0000288209,0.0001446253,7.240589e-7,0.00009595785,0.9776015,0.01089646,0.00006443031,0.002229872,0.007764153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006967517,0.0002118328,0.005258841,0.00001775352,0.0001545353,0.000001131561,0.00005551055,0.9851916,0.006133237,0.00005094489,0.00200264,0.0002251711],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4801814,0.0002792153,0.4660579,0.001976214,0.0006818319,0.001826884,0.0000218982,0.003515591,0.04545902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977625,0.000004827927,0.001456003,0.000232145,0.00008782685,0.00007532,0.000003924767,0.00001841102,0.0003590233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5175811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8260097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007487058171779428,"score_gpt":0.2061509894837512,"score_spread":0.1986639313119718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}