{"id":"W2055092025","doi":"10.3141/2164-17","title":"Evaluating the Use of Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Pervious Concrete Pavement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board","topic":"Urban Stormwater Management Solutions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Pervious concrete; Compressive strength; Permeability (electromagnetism); Environmental science; Aggregate (composite); Void (composites); Void ratio; Waste management; Geotechnical engineering; Materials science; Engineering; Cement; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008602959,0.0004243802,0.0003596838,0.0004698907,0.0002694902,0.0006131098,0.0006895787,0.0005621093,0.0004602232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008255037,0.0001948984,0.0005503264,0.0004260647,0.0002979133,0.0005903724,0.0003235756,0.0003053495,0.0001544835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008226807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005602684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004581023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009624353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989275,0.0002461016,0.00009338594,0.0001832303,0.0004403936,0.0001093335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993324,0.0001407534,0.0001643302,0.00005201488,0.0002396713,0.00007086184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007400108,0.0008029233,0.0106938,0.0003017873,0.00007611875,0.0001763768,0.0001203069,0.006604948,0.9696386,0.0001245029,0.00002796959,0.01069262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002413812,0.01914513,0.0282209,0.00002617141,0.000223409,0.0001217131,0.0002763202,0.005982703,0.9448232,0.00004284968,0.001087114,0.00002635548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990054,0.0001151372,0.0004761149,0.000004351279,0.000001751793,0.00003307077,0.00003474932,0.000006045083,0.0003232797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966557,0.0002243748,0.002499964,0.000004867723,8.651483e-7,0.00002068797,0.00006032863,0.000004758202,0.0005284951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004581023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009108722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2004018299532897,"score_gpt":0.4025934127815862,"score_spread":0.2021915828282965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}