{"id":"W2055092025","doi":"10.3141/2164-17","title":"Evaluating the Use of Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Pervious Concrete Pavement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board","topic":"Urban Stormwater Management Solutions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Pervious concrete; Compressive strength; Permeability (electromagnetism); Environmental science; Aggregate (composite); Void (composites); Void ratio; Waste management; Geotechnical engineering; Materials science; Engineering; Cement; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008095625,0.0002227459,0.0003753068,0.0004985791,0.0005595617,0.0001149844,0.001395197,0.000141194,0.001471992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003498365,0.0001479115,0.0002981983,0.002025136,0.001497287,0.00083411,0.00003330712,0.002335927,0.00003294525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002689474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002014551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04005366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0991484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912005,0.001737524,0.001556425,0.0004066364,0.004253759,0.0008451397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962006,0.001402767,0.0006435959,0.0007309803,0.0007818497,0.0002401964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001397025,0.00008228087,0.7890907,0.0001124046,0.0001618471,0.0000958191,0.006694029,0.005297445,0.1781588,0.002022109,0.007471937,0.009415649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001762777,0.0007050733,0.9690622,0.0001927158,0.00006295121,6.549254e-7,0.0008224897,0.002667963,0.003752677,0.001455434,0.01931962,0.0001954066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945049,0.00004358653,0.0003878698,0.003327871,0.0003911046,0.001148441,0.00003870316,0.00001354691,0.0001439691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946157,0.0002879953,0.003701411,0.00009073022,0.00006432881,0.00009517739,0.00001107906,0.00003924135,0.001094307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1799715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2004018299532897,"score_gpt":0.4025934127815862,"score_spread":0.2021915828282965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}