{"id":"W2055117141","doi":"10.1111/jacf.12051","title":"Three Versions of Perfect Pay for Performance (Or The Rebirth of Partnership Concepts in Executive Pay)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of applied corporate finance","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Executive compensation; Incentive; Pay for performance; General partnership; Shareholder; Leverage (statistics); Shareholder value; Revenue; Economics; Value (mathematics); Profitability index; Profit sharing; Competitive advantage; Management; Finance; Corporate governance; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001110513,0.0002181871,0.0005910407,0.0001465572,0.0001056903,0.00002847334,0.000542109,0.00008356159,0.00001523999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001338561,0.0001091109,0.000151414,0.000795194,0.0001900311,0.0005132057,0.00007124398,0.0003093345,0.000009211756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003459724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001715931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003553462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000141018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983192,0.0000114493,0.0008242858,0.0002109393,0.0003395515,0.0002945819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950133,0.0002286364,0.003984307,0.0003139476,0.0004475226,0.00001227939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02052594,0.0009366858,0.5518847,0.002417678,0.0001875152,0.00004577511,0.00126424,0.01962479,0.006005263,0.2567328,0.04635376,0.09402089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008307497,0.000886653,0.7554895,0.001439786,0.0001994334,0.00001275167,0.0004952932,0.01190115,0.007149999,0.05009902,0.163278,0.0007409163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934272,0.00006220162,0.002641123,0.0005939182,0.0002972113,0.0004676816,0.00001122894,0.000008286474,0.002491141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983736,0.0001709751,0.0004523704,0.0002824675,0.0004140383,0.00002583966,0.000003189249,0.00002272064,0.000254775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2066338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4449414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03787165127703223,"score_gpt":0.2371350246632449,"score_spread":0.1992633733862127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}