{"id":"W2055117141","doi":"10.1111/jacf.12051","title":"Three Versions of Perfect Pay for Performance (Or The Rebirth of Partnership Concepts in Executive Pay)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of applied corporate finance","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Executive compensation; Incentive; Pay for performance; General partnership; Shareholder; Leverage (statistics); Shareholder value; Revenue; Economics; Value (mathematics); Profitability index; Profit sharing; Competitive advantage; Management; Finance; Corporate governance; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007065227,0.0007967664,0.0004443287,0.001146973,0.002940371,0.01244637,0.001684284,0.005560589,0.004680229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01048712,0.0005141978,0.001123088,0.001332361,0.02425553,0.01015738,0.005905919,0.009291524,0.001323315],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007159822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003953816,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004086197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003267384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927368,0.00210683,0.0004024207,0.00103673,0.002710677,0.001006681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949453,0.001602917,0.0007488788,0.001299274,0.0008348345,0.0005687663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001107412,0.000009690893,0.0001320449,0.00001813504,0.000003118172,0.00001563079,0.0005301884,0.00008660131,0.00003712331,0.9863771,0.004593943,0.008185473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004995327,0.0001571907,0.001683801,0.0003513864,0.00001759528,0.000289092,0.00128735,0.001155709,0.0005830082,0.7033358,0.2910043,0.00008472851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03392003,0.01331866,0.1144752,0.09774705,0.007401345,0.0002675565,0.0002450473,0.0004851918,0.7321399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7821705,0.006135545,0.03001735,0.02488445,0.002296701,0.0007292956,0.0001570611,0.0002062404,0.1534027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01244637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05194843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03787165127703223,"score_gpt":0.2371350246632449,"score_spread":0.1992633733862127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}