{"id":"W2055154391","doi":"10.1016/j.cam.2013.02.013","title":"A comonotonicity-based valuation method for guaranteed annuity options","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Mathematics; Actuarial science; Annuity; Regular polygon; Econometrics; Life annuity; Mathematical economics; Economics; Finance; Pension","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001892376,0.00009152538,0.000229339,0.0001404409,0.0003416255,0.0001219905,0.000137423,0.0000479669,0.00002997772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007580396,0.00007952515,0.0001108682,0.0001650777,0.0001094551,0.0001259378,0.00001474283,0.00009061815,0.000005681195],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003824858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000116359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002257809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001237571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987226,0.00006360841,0.0004729925,0.00008964404,0.0005072705,0.0001439588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982279,0.0006587842,0.0004842101,0.00005883279,0.0004970866,0.0000731719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001994219,0.0003411766,0.0001768614,0.0001292916,0.00009446822,3.928199e-7,0.003504897,0.04295778,0.00009223395,0.9436214,0.001014438,0.008047118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008847866,0.00005715985,0.004506199,0.00003469869,0.00009364961,0.000002791988,0.001924167,0.1336024,0.00004436389,0.8564487,0.00227691,0.0001241415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.08734896,0.0000363253,0.9081873,0.001268134,0.00008916541,0.000745365,0.000009333011,0.00001763301,0.002297779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4252214,0.00001008208,0.5743353,0.0002719025,0.00009073056,0.00003738677,0.000003582341,0.000006258703,0.00002335859],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3378724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3242941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03351786272698391,"score_gpt":0.3428013251740087,"score_spread":0.3092834624470248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}