{"id":"W2055162763","doi":"10.1029/2004jb003445","title":"Thermochemical remanent magnetization in Precambrian rocks: Are we sure the geomagnetic field was weak?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","topic":"Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remanence; Geology; Magnetite; Precambrian; Ilmenite; Magnetization; Earth's magnetic field; Mineralogy; Dike; Magnetic mineralogy; Natural remanent magnetization; Geophysics; Curie temperature; Rock magnetism; Condensed matter physics; Magnetic field; Geochemistry; Ferromagnetism; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007651947,0.0002257682,0.0003227033,0.00003188979,0.0001921868,0.00008031358,0.0006650683,0.0001959355,0.0002262437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007775044,0.0001533842,0.0001961626,0.0003422598,0.0002652712,0.00002060721,0.0002847875,0.0007343543,0.00003452721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003581702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001398833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002262737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001754656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972579,0.0004339859,0.0005342268,0.0003248142,0.000834399,0.0006146326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984153,0.0003405899,0.0002073096,0.0004213171,0.0004357464,0.0001797561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003023658,0.0019039,0.07472681,0.0002557807,0.0002981036,0.0002019591,0.001514191,0.001725095,0.4322026,0.0003836429,0.2491901,0.2345742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004015785,0.01046346,0.6162108,0.0005989519,0.00009322108,0.0002162552,0.002898466,0.0009672666,0.07577056,0.003272608,0.2846337,0.0008588769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676196,0.01369817,0.00008204496,0.01518152,0.0001172981,0.0002969362,0.000003062106,0.000005854115,0.002995517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888647,0.004566973,0.0003896086,0.0001916886,0.001507352,0.00002287632,0.000005121276,0.00002526016,0.004426403],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.541484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6254826,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01872077301837091,"score_gpt":0.2935362307049786,"score_spread":0.2748154576866077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}