{"id":"W2055162763","doi":"10.1029/2004jb003445","title":"Thermochemical remanent magnetization in Precambrian rocks: Are we sure the geomagnetic field was weak?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","topic":"Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remanence; Geology; Magnetite; Precambrian; Ilmenite; Magnetization; Earth's magnetic field; Mineralogy; Dike; Magnetic mineralogy; Natural remanent magnetization; Geophysics; Curie temperature; Rock magnetism; Condensed matter physics; Magnetic field; Geochemistry; Ferromagnetism; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007647509,0.000284725,0.0004226054,0.0008037075,0.0005196287,0.0008784534,0.0004542341,0.0005331826,0.0004283655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002244877,0.000277386,0.000112445,0.0005493124,0.001786173,0.001091277,0.0002968538,0.000505543,0.0001586733],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001602267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006251667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02041284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03705063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998652,0.00001522019,0.00001468159,0.00002665906,0.00004438596,0.0000338957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995055,0.00009939579,0.0001277934,0.00004564375,0.0001749986,0.00004655207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006405158,0.00005984298,0.5873367,0.001540744,0.0003109127,0.00124906,0.002850986,0.001578131,0.2471097,0.008429773,0.0007739195,0.1481196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002147713,0.0001692915,0.9498352,0.0002667353,0.0001061862,0.0007077174,0.001472835,0.001205909,0.02898113,0.008687197,0.008498452,0.00004777756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833889,0.01338057,0.0002957627,0.00099178,0.00002432944,0.000004864542,0.00006607312,0.00001541068,0.001832347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957431,0.003417532,0.0001975885,0.0001221493,0.00003501151,0.000003046116,0.00003617785,0.000004424496,0.0004410327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02041284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04058802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01872077301837091,"score_gpt":0.2935362307049786,"score_spread":0.2748154576866077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}