{"id":"W2055318835","doi":"10.1108/07363760210420540","title":"Consumer perceptions of “green power”","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Waterloo","funders":"Commission for Environmental Cooperation","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Business; Marketing; Hydropower; Price premium; Environmental economics; Green marketing; Variance (accounting); Electricity; Nuclear power; Variety (cybernetics); Scale (ratio); Economics; Microeconomics; Geography; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007470399,0.0000908606,0.0001057655,0.0003216907,0.00028701,0.001097489,0.00009249078,0.0002797121,0.005613884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002447449,0.00005780679,0.0001336312,0.0002917072,0.0006679227,0.00045658,0.0002890713,0.0003015363,0.0001528661],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006378398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002781439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01720516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02613166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995311,0.0001204465,0.00001479706,0.00002238884,0.0002550238,0.00005630534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984583,0.0005542992,0.0003799195,0.00005686835,0.0003621934,0.0001884512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005099307,0.0002905334,0.9127309,0.0002027028,0.0001540587,0.0005251687,0.02703533,0.0005981608,0.006518009,0.0045226,0.003254695,0.04365786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001641023,0.000212805,0.9576371,0.00005917326,0.00004078621,0.0001899274,0.02966306,0.000597692,0.0007135865,0.0008988864,0.009943966,0.0000266712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894558,0.00008132723,0.0001203627,0.0002857313,0.000004502778,0.000003921318,0.00002695015,0.000003020895,0.01001836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993594,0.00004208388,0.00003026596,0.00003329823,0.000002539508,8.303543e-7,0.00001271107,6.360497e-7,0.0005182672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01720516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03421009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009063894757443527,"score_gpt":0.2394898044663227,"score_spread":0.2304259097088792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}