{"id":"W2055437633","doi":"10.1007/s12665-009-0303-2","title":"Water quality assessment of Wei River, China using fuzzy synthetic evaluation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Earth Sciences","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Water quality; Environmental science; Pollutant; Water resource management; Mercury (programming language); Sampling (signal processing); Hydrology (agriculture); Agriculture; Water body; Wetland; Wastewater; Environmental engineering; China; Geography; Ecology; Geology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002656331,0.0001793689,0.0002083307,0.00005564478,0.0003850942,0.00004035869,0.0003209884,0.00005694006,0.00597051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009577638,0.0001317846,0.00009615994,0.0001499883,0.001094006,0.0005140624,0.0001448581,0.0001082447,0.0001793235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001594761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000223794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004340164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002282235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968085,0.0004354609,0.0004439268,0.000470851,0.001459084,0.0003821894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994047,0.00002502537,0.0001743189,0.0002825694,0.000002143531,0.0001112583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002127388,0.001001134,0.1645565,0.00001179895,0.00002051706,0.000002879596,0.003493787,0.08001363,0.7221178,0.001609747,0.00004559567,0.02710525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003481084,0.0002522989,0.9354717,0.00001310107,0.00002638403,0.0000060893,0.0002140918,0.01535976,0.04279678,0.004813702,0.0004573614,0.000240692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831598,0.00002746682,0.0006724817,0.0003822232,0.0001493513,0.0003164301,0.00001648997,0.00001832669,0.01525739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931725,0.00001548042,0.006381293,0.0001890753,0.00002299985,0.000004901985,0.00001152159,0.000004532458,0.0001976813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7709151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05697216324724428,"score_gpt":0.342270134048058,"score_spread":0.2852979708008136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}