{"id":"W2055549352","doi":"10.1016/s0269-7491(03)00011-3","title":"Evaluation of caged freshwater mussels as an alternative method for environmental effects monitoring (EEM) studies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Pollution","topic":"Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Domtar (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Mussel; Benthic zone; Environmental science; Effluent; Paper mill; Invertebrate; Fishery; Blue mussel; Kraft process; Pulp mill; Environmental chemistry; Hydrology (agriculture); Kraft paper; Biology; Environmental engineering; Chemistry; Pulp and paper industry; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006629839,0.0005182173,0.0003018265,0.0003437425,0.0002974288,0.0003039414,0.000438939,0.0008167447,0.0009386976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001237578,0.0002165195,0.0002840417,0.0001972634,0.0003777089,0.0003523852,0.000254692,0.0002852619,0.0002327523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003496009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003550527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003061047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008674821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994209,0.0001910305,0.0000344042,0.0001687228,0.0001439963,0.00004090618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986722,0.0003828509,0.0002770959,0.00009441415,0.0004383956,0.0001350277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001910128,0.0004899157,0.05153349,0.0002096058,0.00007349573,0.0001185952,0.0001381741,0.0003878915,0.9310884,0.00005915129,0.00009990024,0.01389127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001442542,0.02479115,0.2403837,0.00004399782,0.0004245414,0.0006094396,0.0002998554,0.00414016,0.7274119,0.0000700051,0.001635164,0.00004583745],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939295,0.0003635457,0.004619336,0.0000332256,0.00003025606,0.00008503093,0.0002893593,0.0000404904,0.0006093121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814827,0.0004882917,0.01392392,0.0001307385,0.00002051515,0.0003321107,0.0006189749,0.00002318103,0.002979677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003061047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006086469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04160017990812223,"score_gpt":0.3376197397650313,"score_spread":0.2960195598569091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}