{"id":"W2055663392","doi":"10.1590/s0104-42302007000300023","title":"Escritores-fantasma e comércio de trabalhos científicos na internet: a ciência em risco","year":2007,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira","topic":"Information Science and Libraries","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; The Internet; Order (exchange); Misconduct; Elaboration; Medical education; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Library science; Business; Law; Medicine; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Humanities; World Wide Web; Engineering; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006104915,0.000887589,0.001144447,0.0007758483,0.001135718,0.006245804,0.004463378,0.0006585229,0.0006560722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009174482,0.0008936336,0.0007285224,0.003085473,0.0006006784,0.004414474,0.001088757,0.001291924,0.001522257],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001320216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001350346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000157399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008762647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910566,0.000539662,0.00215704,0.001288669,0.002460195,0.002497835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945779,0.0007837598,0.001466369,0.001620471,0.0004690241,0.001082459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000205062,0.001067523,0.2286692,0.000589425,0.0004283039,0.0006221525,0.08476757,0.00001889411,0.0003014096,0.2886082,0.2302463,0.164476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004577007,0.001380943,0.4312431,0.002303239,0.0003766699,0.0005823026,0.02486163,0.1030577,0.003932993,0.0005140171,0.4222065,0.00496393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4686225,0.002617622,0.4902553,0.002101829,0.004251726,0.001916885,0.0004621411,0.0009777355,0.02879429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844785,0.00005832754,0.002057391,0.003945148,0.0006542315,0.00002663354,0.00009598503,0.00006930096,0.008614445],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5158561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03309884182707332,"score_gpt":0.2927714860312224,"score_spread":0.259672644204149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}