{"id":"W2055778401","doi":"10.1016/j.jal.2008.07.002","title":"Formalization of the ad hominem argumentation scheme","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Scheme (mathematics); Defeasible estate; Defeasible reasoning; Matching (statistics); Artificial intelligence; Identification (biology); Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Theoretical computer science; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Programming language; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003317195,0.0006372778,0.0008224271,0.001975223,0.001871026,0.004387439,0.002451136,0.002445215,0.01237325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005282943,0.0005069391,0.001292143,0.001422404,0.002919788,0.00466944,0.003285279,0.002675623,0.001769059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001964792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001501465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001102174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008284359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973901,0.001012337,0.0002498954,0.0003941256,0.0007396498,0.0002139173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982511,0.0006507567,0.0001257403,0.0003745407,0.0004504727,0.0001473817],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002229594,0.00001539768,0.00005574757,0.0000374455,0.000008283562,0.00005045518,0.00017816,0.001106317,0.0006382799,0.991192,0.0004820595,0.006213593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005077853,0.00004166393,0.0001125281,0.00006470963,0.00002408124,0.0001686927,0.0001176083,0.0304391,0.001739309,0.9404688,0.02674274,0.00002989349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02712217,0.0005343353,0.9008563,0.001544595,0.0004033012,0.0002684409,0.0004024794,0.0005201387,0.06834819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5002344,0.0003992234,0.4721929,0.0003191727,0.0002305425,0.0003240172,0.0004934644,0.0001189951,0.02568733],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01237325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04139262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02786709962843172,"score_gpt":0.2324495649588235,"score_spread":0.2045824653303918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}