{"id":"W2055778626","doi":"10.1007/s11192-009-0127-6","title":"Citer analysis as a measure of research impact: library and information science as a case study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Measure (data warehouse); Exploratory research; Information science; Citation analysis; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.103942,0.0002322555,0.0005910348,0.5961124,0.001087455,0.01072206,0.003903721,0.0001368511,0.0005129838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1282881,0.0001556869,0.0002560735,0.9083263,0.001326162,0.01781663,0.001755642,0.0005703786,0.0001939565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001814174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001513225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000427543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005294943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9561572,0.000564085,0.00129931,0.001172613,0.03947521,0.001331601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789314,0.005110801,0.0005062384,0.001834374,0.01194732,0.001669907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008595954,0.0009263084,0.7521572,0.000006971199,0.00008751387,0.0004434983,0.004702172,0.0001280275,0.0004229229,0.003107769,0.001011986,0.2369197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00110951,0.003627411,0.9617866,0.00001013407,0.00007825554,0.0004588245,0.01571125,0.009213462,0.001059115,0.004552464,0.002026421,0.0003665728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764564,0.0005082302,0.0003535739,0.0004557128,0.0001845732,0.0007256606,0.00003686323,0.00003782187,0.02124117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985774,0.0001209629,0.0005429459,0.0001461398,0.00002963499,0.000007199872,0.000002886455,0.000006086012,0.0005667274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3122139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5600534252037995,"score_gpt":0.6469165712479984,"score_spread":0.08686314604419887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}