{"id":"W2056020672","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-6584.2003.tb02563.x","title":"A Comparison of Two Stochastic Inverse Methods in a Field‐Scale Application","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ground Water","topic":"Groundwater flow and contamination studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Inverse; Scale (ratio); Field (mathematics); Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Geography; Pure mathematics; Geometry; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000289941,0.0000743768,0.0001439687,0.00003225715,0.00004297466,0.00000949524,0.00007793062,0.0000301108,0.0003369129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001070925,0.00005445309,0.00002736334,0.00009474205,0.00005789787,0.00009939737,0.00005675084,0.00005943464,0.0002110425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005654845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001698962,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005348126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006382507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992765,0.00009518602,0.0002009283,0.0001618499,0.0001112913,0.0001543035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997552,0.00004537595,0.00003254884,0.0001357542,0.000006246431,0.00002488532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003201751,0.0004752312,0.6672724,0.00002819539,0.00002606425,0.000001858252,0.02237591,0.002642014,0.1884621,0.001060552,0.0005215069,0.1171021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004831019,0.0004989111,0.2831983,0.00004184834,0.0001160381,0.00001499618,0.006589055,0.01979375,0.5963154,0.01997162,0.06747422,0.001154843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6161731,0.000008437284,0.3819437,0.00005803461,0.00004919876,0.0001036644,2.548343e-7,0.000007121996,0.001656437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907886,3.544418e-7,0.007825787,0.0001097462,0.000005151274,0.00005130398,0.000002535791,0.000004560631,0.001211983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4078532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3688959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02609435608487883,"score_gpt":0.3369582190355536,"score_spread":0.3108638629506748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}