{"id":"W2056021206","doi":"10.1175/jas3735.1","title":"Predictability of Precipitation from Continental Radar Images. Part IV: Limits to Prediction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences","topic":"Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences","keywords":"Predictability; Nowcasting; Quantitative precipitation forecast; Meteorology; Radar; Climatology; Probabilistic logic; Environmental science; Precipitation; Storm; Computer science; Geology; Mathematics; Statistics; Geography; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008694787,0.00007804982,0.0001749568,0.000007701804,0.0001980248,0.00004292696,0.0004146005,0.00003331678,0.0006809735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003121741,0.00004228697,0.0001020571,0.0004877399,0.0002535786,0.000341368,0.0000137025,0.00008792074,0.000006905727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008184546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006466608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008691863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001766297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984787,0.0001589925,0.0005075742,0.0001392713,0.0005668076,0.0001487224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989216,0.0003679738,0.000408548,0.0001166831,0.0001106683,0.00007456418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005026795,0.00003854535,0.8419681,0.000001969991,0.000008634035,4.458935e-7,0.0001025925,0.1523792,0.001226629,0.00001667974,0.001560091,0.002646882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001874629,0.0003713381,0.980235,0.00001770239,0.00002285261,0.000002855196,0.0001260986,0.0136567,0.0003817687,0.004162105,0.0007894221,0.00004670861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952921,0.0004055594,0.000331449,0.0007428806,0.0009793849,0.0001367231,0.00006616816,0.000007245524,0.002038487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991826,0.000009880749,0.007716208,0.00009583326,0.000260085,3.168707e-7,0.000003595885,0.000001034363,0.00008705611],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1387225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7456182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01816048546908298,"score_gpt":0.2201151479264132,"score_spread":0.2019546624573302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}