{"id":"W2056093399","doi":"10.1080/1747423x.2013.786148","title":"Recent forest expansion in Thailand: a methodological artifact?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Land Use Science","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada; Université de Montréal; University of Ottawa; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"Université de Montréal; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Reforestation; Artifact (error); Scrutiny; Interpretation (philosophy); Geography; Regional science; Forest cover; Environmental resource management; Physical geography; Forestry; Political science; Environmental science; Ecology; Computer science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1110243,0.0004124078,0.0005581271,0.005660075,0.001268256,0.003625871,0.001686695,0.0006834532,0.001324843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2214414,0.0003028103,0.000634292,0.01049162,0.005377641,0.003120115,0.002230561,0.0009655949,0.000248407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001791313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002847821,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01319392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02398498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9127005,0.06156344,0.01343883,0.004541432,0.007025393,0.0007304124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6747735,0.2221804,0.06749353,0.01608755,0.01865193,0.0008131813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002703501,0.00005778453,0.7555963,0.006063552,0.0008211009,0.002599533,0.0603509,0.0009824957,0.0008864804,0.03990934,0.006685206,0.1257769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006705519,0.0005578457,0.7686656,0.006878464,0.00110663,0.004694032,0.09494672,0.003911155,0.00493195,0.02591312,0.08802837,0.0002990627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.741573,0.04483359,0.1203884,0.04631003,0.003023042,0.001471761,0.005190903,0.0003338343,0.03687547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625707,0.00605467,0.02305163,0.004807894,0.000852269,0.0005194365,0.0008955051,0.0001101035,0.00113796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8889757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5871596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0906490778520876,"score_gpt":0.2791696602247076,"score_spread":0.18852058237262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}