{"id":"W2056256778","doi":"10.2514/1.c032451","title":"Optimal Configuration Design for the Variable Geometry Wing-Box","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aircraft","topic":"Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control","field":"Engineering","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Kinematics; Configuration design; Wing; Configuration space; Morphing; Optimal design; Rigidity (electromagnetism); Aeroelasticity; Stiffness; Mechanism (biology); Reconfigurability; Computer science; Control theory (sociology); Engineering; Structural engineering; Aerospace engineering; Aerodynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003252342,0.0004579838,0.000422194,0.0003450798,0.0002230458,0.0004675793,0.0004468511,0.0004862561,0.002865278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005478225,0.0002605476,0.0002731815,0.0001905655,0.0005749541,0.0004074251,0.0005249787,0.000356982,0.0003603132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002405887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003996468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004204942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004630245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997867,0.00006015731,0.000008870377,0.00004920753,0.00006603686,0.000029093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998214,0.00006175289,0.00004674222,0.00001941655,0.00003608664,0.0000146104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001032088,0.00003138748,0.0006239996,0.0001142917,0.00001657128,0.0001626547,0.00006031233,0.9157126,0.0246837,0.02589508,0.0005513509,0.03204479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003689875,0.0002857563,0.0005956725,0.00003128908,0.00001759459,0.0001632289,0.00004411854,0.9781427,0.006194406,0.01043947,0.004027062,0.00002175573],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08940613,0.0003381091,0.8989657,0.0001018542,0.00003996164,0.00008391403,0.00006528766,0.000174408,0.01082466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8419888,0.0001957219,0.1547534,0.0000378546,0.0000117216,0.0001439342,0.00008391693,0.00005251492,0.002732119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002865278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009585321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01291107890353332,"score_gpt":0.2166637942764092,"score_spread":0.2037527153728759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}