{"id":"W2056266707","doi":"10.1016/s0165-1765(00)00211-1","title":"Existence and uniqueness of Cournot equilibrium: a contraction mapping approach","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Cournot competition; Uniqueness; Mathematical economics; Contraction (grammar); Economics; Contraction mapping; Marginal cost; General equilibrium theory; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Fixed point; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004603606,0.000164609,0.0004748029,0.0001313678,0.00005812208,0.00007839238,0.000188301,0.00008605373,0.0002929477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009536243,0.0002176646,0.00009445696,0.00005472279,0.0001546565,0.0004346035,0.00003519618,0.0001162354,0.00006221603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009197641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001281138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001685699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003380911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998587,0.00001275304,0.0006924184,0.0004294235,0.000009728619,0.0002686346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991928,0.00005236937,0.0003507535,0.0003155484,0.000008950622,0.00007953522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103544,0.00009175025,0.008041628,0.0001088224,0.0001635422,0.000002094092,0.001459783,0.005834435,0.001146081,0.9771848,0.0003452705,0.005518234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009065223,0.0003270562,0.03625403,0.0001687297,0.00007381542,0.0002779496,0.001709582,0.1927306,0.004074675,0.4372355,0.3139233,0.00415946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9617493,0.0004047871,0.002543255,0.001038548,0.0001806803,0.0001801712,0.00009069611,0.00002649799,0.03378611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945633,0.0004291516,0.0032919,0.0009954316,0.0001019111,0.00001940966,0.00001550839,0.00002955351,0.0005538036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5399492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8876104,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0286542855417558,"score_gpt":0.1854250246644764,"score_spread":0.1567707391227206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}