{"id":"W2056266707","doi":"10.1016/s0165-1765(00)00211-1","title":"Existence and uniqueness of Cournot equilibrium: a contraction mapping approach","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Cournot competition; Uniqueness; Mathematical economics; Contraction (grammar); Economics; Contraction mapping; Marginal cost; General equilibrium theory; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Fixed point; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004339995,0.001219783,0.002075154,0.00172119,0.001742806,0.003082514,0.002177894,0.002512734,0.006106509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01647069,0.001070113,0.002104267,0.001365033,0.004890794,0.008448331,0.003472446,0.004361332,0.0005452764],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001566825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002656136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001812881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001104935,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984143,0.0008814759,0.00005960836,0.0002722681,0.0001992526,0.0001730354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892595,0.008459397,0.0005431094,0.0003623692,0.0008889801,0.0004867185],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001892429,0.00001922414,0.0001301599,0.00005281244,0.00002157511,0.0000566584,0.000151081,0.01332638,0.0003720711,0.9822614,0.0008168701,0.002772877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001147276,0.00001031651,0.00008393186,0.00001836181,0.000008678103,0.00003358502,0.0000499823,0.07013385,0.0001067684,0.9287426,0.0007887978,0.00001167139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04556856,0.002220667,0.9068252,0.005130625,0.0002601525,0.00007343245,0.00009784809,0.00006655887,0.03975695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8014194,0.004370262,0.1621601,0.000929246,0.001012387,0.0004025907,0.0001892315,0.0002092273,0.02930756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006106509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02295238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0286542855417558,"score_gpt":0.1854250246644764,"score_spread":0.1567707391227206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}