{"id":"W2056279153","doi":"10.5558/tfc79517-3","title":"Western redcedar population dynamics in old-growth forests: Contrasting ecological paradigms using tree rings","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Sault Area Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tsuga; Western Hemlock; Disturbance (geology); Understory; Ecological succession; Ecology; Canopy; Population; Dendrochronology; Old-growth forest; Geography; Regeneration (biology); Forest dynamics; Dominance (genetics); Stand development; Forestry; Biology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003439618,0.0001469911,0.0001850904,0.00001137988,0.0004885212,0.00003227492,0.0002175306,0.000145,0.00005887667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001446987,0.00005676644,0.00006941207,0.0002350711,0.0001574681,0.0001582274,0.00008700625,0.0001960139,0.00002030302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003107341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008363427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988666,0.000116516,0.0002090475,0.0002176714,0.0001166837,0.0004735047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995463,0.0002200077,0.00009973782,0.0000572346,0.00002244971,0.00005430576],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002245182,0.00008365615,0.9947888,0.000004018033,0.00001117016,0.000006543254,0.00004660014,0.00009683303,0.0001698041,0.004316052,0.0000268282,0.0004272133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000286438,0.0001378334,0.9939061,0.00001369368,0.0000177874,0.00002105855,0.000419593,0.001686303,0.00008754936,0.003166463,0.0001142978,0.0001428598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982411,0.0001553983,0.000003753451,0.0006458657,0.0001135062,0.000215748,0.00001401786,0.00004600673,0.0005646331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995914,0.00001581492,0.00004714055,0.0001727597,0.00008333012,0.000007055362,0.00002728363,0.000001090473,0.0000542031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02536682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02365184667441533,"score_gpt":0.2237079516521367,"score_spread":0.2000561049777214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}