{"id":"W2056306711","doi":"10.1007/s11219-012-9180-0","title":"Influence of confirmation biases of developers on software quality: an empirical study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Quality Journal","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Assertion; Empirical research; Software quality; Confirmation bias; Software metric; Software development; Cognitive bias; Context (archaeology); Empirical evidence; Software bug; Software; Metric (unit); Quality (philosophy); Data science; Cognition; Software engineering; Psychology; Social psychology; Statistics; Engineering; Operations management; Mathematics; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02991227,0.0004335238,0.0005991871,0.00278127,0.001073372,0.002401331,0.0009329435,0.001492272,0.00230082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3625875,0.0003899301,0.0005175006,0.001756725,0.001549204,0.001987373,0.001539076,0.001513828,0.0003405603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001561073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003136302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004164235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004319952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.966521,0.01952877,0.002187338,0.001955223,0.008443899,0.00136377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1840073,0.7021711,0.06753559,0.01581276,0.02519176,0.005281414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001107031,0.0006016135,0.9707959,0.0001476127,0.0001469863,0.0003008158,0.004421147,0.00043081,0.001468674,0.0004276343,0.0003713258,0.01978031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001665847,0.001176746,0.9830056,0.0001342876,0.0004940955,0.0006313599,0.004659436,0.003918741,0.003484061,0.001050813,0.00121218,0.00006604176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980628,0.000202506,0.0004278989,0.0001101137,0.000008624272,0.00001830335,0.00003005907,0.0000123465,0.001127417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994332,0.00005586494,0.0002898162,0.00002937529,0.00001384002,0.000008723443,0.00002537167,0.0000081857,0.0001357241],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9700877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1581931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1403867965763272,"score_gpt":0.4310662005548037,"score_spread":0.2906794039784765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}