{"id":"W2056314243","doi":"10.1002/cjce.5450780107","title":"Correlations for the particle deposition rate accounting for lift forces and hydrodynamic mobility reduction","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Lift (data mining); Mechanics; Particle deposition; Deposition (geology); Particle (ecology); Volumetric flow rate; Computer simulation; Particle size; Materials science; Physics; Classical mechanics; Engineering; Computer science; Geology; Chemical engineering; Turbulence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001561034,0.0005901497,0.000604222,0.0009965812,0.000327779,0.0006084905,0.000712702,0.0005741103,0.001482734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006065638,0.0003498649,0.000651039,0.0004854077,0.000362871,0.0007069178,0.0003912221,0.0005820722,0.000548833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006360397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001008614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002146092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001061598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996228,0.00007787786,0.00002869697,0.00005031646,0.0001713064,0.00004890727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970738,0.001884914,0.0002811819,0.0002530291,0.0004524862,0.00005457982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001667116,0.00007413192,0.004754684,0.0003188762,0.00004806113,0.0003691964,0.00007662369,0.8728914,0.05518031,0.04002888,0.0007726701,0.02531847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001083168,0.00001662487,0.0007148248,0.00001112034,0.000007591132,0.00004242558,0.000003711492,0.9837827,0.0134183,0.001562045,0.0004142681,0.00001546092],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3650894,0.001337854,0.6249018,0.0001786927,0.0001270072,0.0001822482,0.000485231,0.0009981863,0.006699659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.936003,0.0007821741,0.06027377,0.00001949658,0.00003295486,0.0001846307,0.0003653685,0.0001678246,0.002170772],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002146092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008255601,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006253911734384941,"score_gpt":0.192787377872071,"score_spread":0.186533466137686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}