{"id":"W2056375589","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.02.027","title":"Evaluation of remedial options for a benzene-contaminated site through a simulation-based fuzzy-MCDA approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Fuzzy logic; Environmental remediation; Computer science; TOPSIS; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Contamination; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02396202,0.0001608205,0.0007647609,0.0004035993,0.000154243,0.0001381656,0.0003883087,0.0001359381,0.0004689212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00831447,0.0001118997,0.0003989895,0.0005124873,0.00006678527,0.0007910376,0.00003069531,0.00007545961,0.00002476055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001102874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003276996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000290256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002312766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937029,0.001134362,0.001933182,0.0001868446,0.002769616,0.0002730231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914719,0.001818727,0.002181299,0.0003665397,0.004047092,0.000114366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001713456,0.001097608,0.004524061,0.00004090045,0.0005646527,0.000002371298,0.004575871,0.7486692,0.2124182,0.0008459194,0.001952035,0.02359573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02242792,0.002097733,0.0719903,0.00031693,0.009562084,0.00008668803,0.005034295,0.3947138,0.3456789,0.1361434,0.01044291,0.001504979],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.91656,0.0003620803,0.08089853,0.0003556154,0.001038447,0.0004130812,0.00007932159,0.000007939572,0.0002850096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850793,0.00002639976,0.01407113,0.00005210399,0.0006668113,0.00001680229,0.0000254215,0.00001481969,0.00004720879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3539554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2012801812440805,"score_gpt":0.4315816084086208,"score_spread":0.2303014271645402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}