{"id":"W2056394552","doi":"10.1177/0092070302250901","title":"Effect of Environmental Dynamism on Relational Governance in Manufacturer-Supplier Relationships: A Contingency Framework and an Empirical Test","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dynamism; Contingency; Business; Corporate governance; Upstream (networking); Downstream (manufacturing); Contingency theory; Industrial organization; Test (biology); Empirical research; Knowledge management; Process management; Marketing; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01135013,0.0001015493,0.000171624,0.0002072086,0.000183251,0.00003617135,0.0003598448,0.00007066657,0.00005232402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006897762,0.00006925744,0.00004868508,0.0005769061,0.0002784904,0.0005146586,0.0001030952,0.0005299301,0.000002593267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006585514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001868525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.878075e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.858729e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984315,0.0001604717,0.0005026629,0.0001537668,0.0006029402,0.0001486313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978707,0.001020353,0.0009667441,0.00009436184,0.00003448327,0.00001338077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002374903,0.0001421619,0.9241011,0.0001179788,0.000009783394,0.000001114569,0.0001320849,0.000128835,0.002104257,0.06687929,0.0002231667,0.005922783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004609881,0.00004486611,0.989636,0.0003256798,0.00002159561,0.000004421526,0.0001188494,0.001528624,0.0008612407,0.005619617,0.001291011,0.00008712141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799234,0.00006578353,0.00005528986,0.00125089,0.0001501554,0.000141794,0.000001041981,0.000002985009,0.01840865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983907,0.000008867919,0.001054754,0.0003622641,0.00009632541,7.699913e-7,1.310197e-7,0.000005953817,0.00008019298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06553493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8257763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01609579106217599,"score_gpt":0.2786093553892424,"score_spread":0.2625135643270664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}