{"id":"W2056397681","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9558-4","title":"Towards Improving the Ethics of Ecological Research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; University of Otago","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Information ethics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Ecology; Management science; Epistemology; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02580597,0.00009002722,0.0000921141,0.00003736742,0.0007512836,0.00005165492,0.0005595642,0.0002480522,0.0000407571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008157734,0.000060628,0.00002192912,0.0005567885,0.003875516,0.0002068963,0.0006920247,0.002527209,0.00002695756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000162821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001253699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002340061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002958054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971655,0.0001458947,0.0001485123,0.0002919992,0.001877206,0.0003708726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980913,0.001404862,0.00003153673,0.0002976057,0.00006116463,0.0001135463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001937482,0.0001714746,0.005914277,0.0003468951,0.00001062512,0.000004740559,0.03166566,0.03958968,0.4437145,0.4574295,0.0002841152,0.0208491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008138239,0.001557891,0.4142966,0.0002543016,0.00004432827,0.00007040373,0.002634786,0.2311476,0.07879455,0.1724622,0.09651346,0.001410027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9345171,0.00008147244,0.003042326,0.03165548,0.0004102266,0.0002603493,0.00000294554,0.00006773343,0.02996236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972636,0.00007201933,0.001916204,0.0006474836,0.00004583094,0.000006236138,1.962958e-7,0.000006678941,0.00004173109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4083824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08737308156140079,"score_gpt":0.3292215824416627,"score_spread":0.2418485008802619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}