{"id":"W2056417301","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.003","title":"Proposed reference point for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with cone-beam computerized tomography","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","topic":"Dental Radiography and Imaging","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Landmark; Cephalometric analysis; Cone beam computed tomography; Orthodontics; Point (geometry); Computed tomography; Software; Cephalometry; Medicine; Dentistry; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Geometry; Radiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001926297,0.001170164,0.0009290361,0.004141399,0.001213197,0.002763486,0.003094847,0.0021714,0.005809507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059061,0.0005546593,0.0008522528,0.002470396,0.0008599329,0.001479089,0.001762469,0.001179301,0.00495379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009785962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00225025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003645486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003530612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982761,0.0003867227,0.0001411809,0.0003828728,0.0007139288,0.00009925394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975203,0.0002563433,0.0001182212,0.000329179,0.001689209,0.00008675816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004121539,0.0001100488,0.009505169,0.000455595,0.0001043395,0.001405525,0.0006578016,0.01760673,0.07109781,0.07350817,0.02077946,0.8043572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002714408,0.000805283,0.02429662,0.0004693146,0.0004192855,0.007000147,0.0009118201,0.5111223,0.2377006,0.04723589,0.1692021,0.000565281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003916376,0.0002582041,0.9916312,0.0001309655,0.0001003465,0.00008338656,0.0002070137,0.001207441,0.002465043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1023393,0.0004398978,0.8935288,0.00007501481,0.00005720536,0.0003128739,0.0007621916,0.0002197687,0.002264793],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005809507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01943475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0139022943434315,"score_gpt":0.2722524508760121,"score_spread":0.2583501565325806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}