{"id":"W2056430822","doi":"10.1071/cp12208","title":"Assessment of an indirect technique to predict hay and silage storage dry matter losses through Monte Carlo simulation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crop and Pasture Science","topic":"Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Silage; Forage; Hay; Dry matter; Statistics; Monte Carlo method; Coefficient of variation; Mathematics; Ruminant; Sample size determination; Statistic; Agronomy; Agricultural engineering; Environmental science; Biology; Pasture; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003984118,0.000678248,0.0008223777,0.0007805203,0.0004173534,0.0007261079,0.001032179,0.001027642,0.001046475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01565483,0.0004559231,0.0006030319,0.0004864044,0.0003533547,0.0005188502,0.0005169336,0.0006692876,0.000149829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001054832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001448404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0171337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01106441,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991493,0.0005296458,0.00003974742,0.00009522081,0.0001362384,0.00004979452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982469,0.01493873,0.0007049295,0.0006134547,0.001138642,0.0001352249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001053731,0.00004324644,0.005497959,0.00002430199,0.00005488228,0.00001238577,0.00002033957,0.9872437,0.0007247605,0.000723206,0.00005488343,0.005494951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007747646,0.00003077218,0.0005081472,0.000003694093,0.000007733812,0.000006234439,0.000002097487,0.9988642,0.0003737897,0.0001521843,0.00003970994,0.000003693374],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.446961,0.0002386215,0.5485014,0.0001544205,0.00002155608,0.0003400849,0.0003682604,0.000872916,0.002541744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8528113,0.0001009928,0.1456214,0.00004588609,0.00001009819,0.0004714558,0.0002626365,0.00006247088,0.0006137126],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0171337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03406793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02047494291109934,"score_gpt":0.2902360281367117,"score_spread":0.2697610852256123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}