{"id":"W2056444621","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00124.x","title":"RECOGNIZING GOOD ATTENDANCE: A LONGITUDINAL, QUASI‐EXPERIMENTAL FIELD STUDY","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Absenteeism; Psychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Longitudinal field; Reinforcement; Baseline (sea); Applied psychology; Perception; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002716946,0.0002760325,0.0003720758,0.0002026163,0.000319317,0.00002914719,0.0003652536,0.0002461609,0.04403919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003458324,0.0002811691,0.0002208784,0.0003112089,0.00009474502,0.0001206517,0.00005296311,0.000555185,0.005327444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005357417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005415332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000732104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002337178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974098,0.0002987414,0.0005215349,0.0008425051,0.0001665465,0.0007609343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987433,0.00008517785,0.0002016459,0.0006821555,0.00005368227,0.0002340506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005064961,0.03948682,0.5563061,0.00002158974,0.0002746906,0.0005479819,0.0542449,1.881769e-7,0.0007394317,0.0008864569,0.2781239,0.06886144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01654594,0.04817345,0.7598744,0.000153753,0.0002961087,0.001316703,0.1279049,0.0001143943,0.0002718241,0.0001288569,0.04322546,0.001994189],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9437948,0.002521879,0.0001456861,0.002082785,0.004022663,0.0005935738,0.00001523314,0.0001776978,0.04664561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903183,0.00001750454,0.0001905253,0.002533681,0.0004122235,0.0003528296,0.000006410588,0.00004406167,0.006124437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2348984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2072850769058153,"score_gpt":0.4642903899275975,"score_spread":0.2570053130217822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}