{"id":"W2056547729","doi":"10.3152/147154603781766455","title":"A square peg in a round hole: fitting impact assessment under the Antarctic Environmental Protocol to Antarctic tourism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Polar Research and Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Antarctic treaty; Tourism; Treaty; Environmental impact assessment; Montreal Protocol; Argument (complex analysis); Protocol (science); Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental protection; Environmental science; Geography; Law; Chemistry; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01769664,0.000604707,0.000375842,0.002287321,0.004451444,0.008572998,0.001816825,0.006192752,0.007995797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03667804,0.0004329077,0.0006451181,0.002977236,0.005762303,0.008279624,0.0061006,0.005247297,0.002230796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006141045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02756267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03568331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06174794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9859796,0.006497472,0.0009087275,0.0004342776,0.005186551,0.0009933861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929103,0.003344324,0.0003948693,0.0005151884,0.002437123,0.0003982023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001066567,0.00007968808,0.001807949,0.0003362277,0.000009914367,0.0008209539,0.003933936,0.002390797,0.0006610032,0.7051187,0.1758264,0.1089077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003093044,0.000129749,0.003173805,0.001485969,0.00002399867,0.0002238838,0.006946867,0.001223522,0.0006502724,0.1016132,0.8844233,0.00007440717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02494649,0.009786315,0.04821789,0.1146056,0.004988215,0.003345878,0.001112881,0.0003741918,0.7926225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3859726,0.03235386,0.1384701,0.08530086,0.002875458,0.007783226,0.003120602,0.000550321,0.3435729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03568331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09358984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02593486115253512,"score_gpt":0.4231623366201872,"score_spread":0.397227475467652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}