{"id":"W2056613253","doi":"10.1093/ehjci/jet040","title":"CMR imaging for the evaluation of myocardial stunning after acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of prospective trials","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","topic":"Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Myocardial infarction; Stunning; Cardiology; Sequela; Internal medicine; Myocardial stunning; Predictive value; Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Dobutamine; Cardiac magnetic resonance; Radiology; Surgery; Hemodynamics; Ischemia","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01943336,0.002627074,0.01501503,0.005148157,0.00059703,0.003419674,0.002155398,0.002391187,0.002874993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04336891,0.00119443,0.03624183,0.007436231,0.0007700411,0.001944312,0.001292596,0.00230486,0.000282218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00142094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001947909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003942647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007463814,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867132,0.007182537,0.003278357,0.001348358,0.00110325,0.0003743888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9427415,0.04632432,0.006836178,0.001532225,0.002086574,0.00047911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004880499,0.00003581383,0.01773912,0.154109,0.8121144,0.0001637649,0.00006235508,0.0004674509,0.00022254,0.00009735487,0.0004672922,0.009640425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005619237,0.0002068892,0.00830524,0.01013227,0.9797064,0.00008045037,0.00002568495,0.0002147333,0.00008159174,0.0001050203,0.0005639807,0.00001585954],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009074304,0.9893599,0.0004587221,0.0002218404,0.0001219076,0.0001315788,0.0003811338,0.00002196447,0.0002286442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3776974,0.615465,0.002919089,0.001067109,0.0006013834,0.0007274526,0.001178054,0.00005521518,0.0002892707],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01943336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1027747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2174113466183079,"score_gpt":0.4235473001115081,"score_spread":0.2061359534932002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}