{"id":"W2056613253","doi":"10.1093/ehjci/jet040","title":"CMR imaging for the evaluation of myocardial stunning after acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of prospective trials","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","topic":"Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Myocardial infarction; Stunning; Cardiology; Sequela; Internal medicine; Myocardial stunning; Predictive value; Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Dobutamine; Cardiac magnetic resonance; Radiology; Surgery; Hemodynamics; Ischemia","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04378181,0.0009258983,0.0129157,0.001553006,0.0003502418,0.0003531153,0.0003754382,0.0001013632,0.0001776691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005957017,0.0005888844,0.06340028,0.001536619,0.0003090787,0.0003543757,0.0002492516,0.001247169,0.00002690094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004129453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000895713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004465568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.546288e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9837928,0.008285323,0.003252,0.0008795403,0.003133012,0.0006573535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892539,0.002942635,0.00191575,0.001834661,0.003764868,0.0002881799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006471882,0.00004379164,0.0006470252,0.0007900852,0.6665293,0.00008240974,0.0002452955,0.001064358,0.00000293423,0.000002433786,0.002529979,0.3279977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00139826,0.00003395049,0.002889917,0.0008055912,0.6609987,0.00148992,0.0001026763,0.0003364092,0.000003926731,0.000009977521,0.3315937,0.0003369379],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002625491,0.9826621,0.00965065,0.0002524943,0.001555617,0.004630318,0.0002857474,0.00004609783,0.0008907687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007661344,0.9835462,0.00223949,0.0002855932,0.004625906,0.001107499,0.0001409593,0.0003386222,0.00005440188],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3290637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996563,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2174113466183079,"score_gpt":0.4235473001115081,"score_spread":0.2061359534932002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}