{"id":"W2056652416","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.01.004","title":"Further evidence of the validity of the Suicide Risk Assessment Scale for prisoners","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","topic":"Suicide and Self-Harm Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Referral; Risk assessment; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Test (biology); Medicine; Injury prevention; Scale (ratio); Psychiatry; Human factors and ergonomics; Recidivism; Occupational safety and health; Risk management tools; Suicide Risk; Medical emergency; Psychology; Family medicine; Computer security; Computer science; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02843341,0.0005688241,0.0006014463,0.002937266,0.001252752,0.001947261,0.001991609,0.001555118,0.006061672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1380698,0.0004453746,0.001466224,0.001740622,0.002718437,0.002039978,0.001301254,0.001815149,0.001087859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008798355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002029195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006734411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008870202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903019,0.005158097,0.001024126,0.0006481727,0.002452534,0.000415081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7672734,0.1780823,0.01064109,0.01260388,0.02896967,0.002429574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001181897,0.0004584554,0.9339297,0.000516833,0.0004498746,0.0002426892,0.003974928,0.0002291516,0.001221369,0.002324773,0.001569771,0.05390059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001336114,0.001140384,0.9858561,0.000672904,0.0002084694,0.0005188691,0.002249268,0.00121922,0.001154467,0.001573659,0.005231744,0.00004131043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9623869,0.003524962,0.002809811,0.00503388,0.0006924593,0.0003104988,0.0008950272,0.00002701873,0.02431941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991879,0.001055866,0.002753342,0.0009333892,0.0002722229,0.0001590718,0.0008492853,0.00002678447,0.002071074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02843341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.150372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04055635943295172,"score_gpt":0.372265740319368,"score_spread":0.3317093808864163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}