{"id":"W2056730537","doi":"10.1002/sim.4305","title":"Monitoring binary outcomes using risk‐adjusted charts: a comparative study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Windsor; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"CUSUM; Computer science; Control chart; Statistics; Statistical process control; Context (archaeology); Type I and type II errors; Shewhart individuals control chart; Binary number; Chart; Mathematics; EWMA chart; Process (computing)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002690102,0.0003257124,0.000973792,0.000564331,0.0002542398,0.00003567194,0.0006974645,0.00006375945,0.0003590761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01370341,0.0002324757,0.00002847815,0.001179466,0.0004396116,0.0002860449,0.0002093483,0.0005848753,0.00007247284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001568427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006000726,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008415284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001164974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949464,0.0005210157,0.001428234,0.0007292984,0.001879315,0.0004957633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930072,0.005008648,0.0005663944,0.0006317517,0.0005545146,0.0002315032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001025297,0.0003136694,0.9611856,0.00001082784,0.000041346,0.0003433467,0.0240873,0.0003292309,0.00007589444,0.001436058,0.0001788573,0.01189539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001750823,0.0006895376,0.8523483,0.0001302098,0.00007700556,0.000004341654,0.05100962,0.009656182,0.00008082038,0.08391985,0.00003572465,0.0002975971],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5618087,0.0002208466,0.434,0.00002230484,0.00188663,0.0005561537,0.0001192806,0.0000562122,0.001329865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8747383,0.00002035373,0.1248234,0.00001540253,0.000189347,0.00002474144,0.000002204941,0.00002258048,0.0001636955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3129296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4789125639840743,"score_gpt":0.5315657088707874,"score_spread":0.05265314488671308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}