{"id":"W2056886934","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.07.002","title":"Kaplan–Meier methods yielded misleading results in competing risk scenarios","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Acute Myocardial Infarction Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health Services; University of Calgary","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Government of Canada","keywords":"Censoring (clinical trials); Kaplan–Meier estimator; Medicine; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Event (particle physics); Survival analysis; Cumulative incidence; Statistics; Proportional hazards model; Bypass grafting; Incidence (geometry); Cardiology; Surgery; Artery; Mathematics; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09925126,0.0001805579,0.00301802,0.0003858674,0.00006697876,0.000007810247,0.0002436982,0.0005825697,0.00009746657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2504229,0.0001309953,0.0008530758,0.0003365361,0.0003335222,0.00008465524,0.00009658721,0.003568995,0.0000471697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001088443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002938799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005466992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002753881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9770659,0.0143065,0.007327819,0.0003693476,0.0003147074,0.0006156923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9036783,0.09146555,0.003550601,0.0003997048,0.0004718224,0.0004339953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004848881,0.0003887,0.8532904,0.00003300158,0.0003176455,0.000434664,0.0000688422,0.002242894,0.0004853065,0.0003832463,0.07663829,0.06086814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007806794,0.001582113,0.8142523,0.000298886,0.0001695938,0.0008285328,0.0001352498,0.008601539,0.0001016352,0.004760639,0.161288,0.0001747481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8070638,0.001252954,0.03811089,0.1336109,0.002991738,0.0004697155,0.00001739297,0.00004467264,0.01643791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6476688,0.001727755,0.32811,0.01592884,0.005604479,0.000004543072,0.0000145192,0.00004290518,0.0008981338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2899991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3066418190443426,"score_gpt":0.5753369775761458,"score_spread":0.2686951585318032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}