{"id":"W2056886934","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.07.002","title":"Kaplan–Meier methods yielded misleading results in competing risk scenarios","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Acute Myocardial Infarction Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health Services; University of Calgary","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Government of Canada","keywords":"Censoring (clinical trials); Kaplan–Meier estimator; Medicine; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Event (particle physics); Survival analysis; Cumulative incidence; Statistics; Proportional hazards model; Bypass grafting; Incidence (geometry); Cardiology; Surgery; Artery; Mathematics; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1584024,0.002748928,0.003567023,0.003913167,0.001069971,0.002927102,0.002369269,0.002569774,0.01481128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5122681,0.001079841,0.00380579,0.003132456,0.001397431,0.004642862,0.001826699,0.006374232,0.002781253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001128352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00133713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00243449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003090729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8595974,0.128969,0.004213238,0.003603772,0.002822464,0.0007940439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2416444,0.7404414,0.003261889,0.009275283,0.004758778,0.000618226],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008704703,0.0006081373,0.06078679,0.008036041,0.02250533,0.003099825,0.002921579,0.2394056,0.001097849,0.08252499,0.06601223,0.504297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001458693,0.001982399,0.02580233,0.002386968,0.01022225,0.00518488,0.001262361,0.4634923,0.003761688,0.4406678,0.04317783,0.0006004305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.07068546,0.01411131,0.8868443,0.004700376,0.00258931,0.001183711,0.006181165,0.002611281,0.01109317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7736398,0.003139181,0.2088943,0.003630407,0.0009987771,0.001420815,0.003312224,0.00151498,0.003449526],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8415976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8377219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3066418190443426,"score_gpt":0.5753369775761458,"score_spread":0.2686951585318032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}