{"id":"W2056960121","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-04-2012-00998","title":"Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":782,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Transparency (behavior); Accounting; Originality; Sustainability reporting; Content analysis; Business; Value (mathematics); Relevance (law); Sustainable development; Sociology; Corporate social responsibility; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004494308,0.0006078008,0.0008674701,0.0005228375,0.001249957,0.002003718,0.0004089524,0.0001910742,0.002332757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007286563,0.0005569801,0.0002617625,0.001029145,0.0004616434,0.005718647,0.0009727257,0.0006369457,0.0000686062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003552103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002037713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004935336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000183995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944513,0.0000498069,0.002268378,0.0009641585,0.00133677,0.000929573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990759,0.0003842532,0.003457916,0.0008044001,0.004524258,0.00007013336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003977221,0.0002849345,0.9782789,0.001067245,0.0001788631,0.0001768011,0.0003271748,0.0002979375,0.0002990738,0.001794051,0.01237056,0.004884677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001079883,0.00007712307,0.673164,0.0004913349,0.0004646394,0.001401838,0.009461546,0.003360238,0.0001034727,0.2300577,0.0787459,0.001592297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857072,0.000436342,0.0003715783,0.002441789,0.0009069308,0.001011381,0.000002183386,0.0002261769,0.008896385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954091,0.00004083796,0.0004468664,0.001722467,0.002051558,0.00005525482,0.00002036141,0.00008301119,0.0001705548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3051149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008102974728582039,"score_gpt":0.2367286902732016,"score_spread":0.2286257155446196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}