{"id":"W2056960121","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-04-2012-00998","title":"Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":782,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Transparency (behavior); Accounting; Originality; Sustainability reporting; Content analysis; Business; Value (mathematics); Relevance (law); Sustainable development; Sociology; Corporate social responsibility; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02903753,0.0005408489,0.0002806623,0.00616824,0.002715257,0.01213726,0.0009139882,0.001337897,0.002090241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1508519,0.0004237032,0.00023983,0.007095431,0.00857404,0.0151778,0.00526355,0.002486519,0.0004166708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003347382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002687611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003103276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002498901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9443191,0.0383136,0.003094282,0.001565395,0.01153049,0.001177164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7477708,0.1531613,0.05505974,0.02284371,0.01931299,0.001851482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005175103,0.0001246318,0.05885942,0.001333706,0.00008739612,0.001344358,0.3436663,0.001016873,0.005813711,0.3335384,0.02217378,0.2315239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003125664,0.0003542927,0.0692388,0.002814885,0.0001227885,0.003158665,0.3944234,0.006036435,0.0102536,0.05919609,0.4541297,0.0002400442],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7586579,0.006161836,0.04220872,0.06578416,0.0033331,0.0003721268,0.0006479753,0.0005701411,0.122264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989986,0.0009412819,0.004092723,0.001408065,0.0004575549,0.00005813658,0.00008087067,0.00009307473,0.002882301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02903753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.153567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008102974728582039,"score_gpt":0.2367286902732016,"score_spread":0.2286257155446196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}