{"id":"W2056969652","doi":"10.1121/1.1419086","title":"Quantifying uncertainty in geoacoustic inversion. I. A fast Gibbs sampler approach","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","topic":"Underwater Acoustics Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":225,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Gibbs sampling; Simulated annealing; Computation; Algorithm; Bayesian probability; Approximate Bayesian computation; Monte Carlo method; Computer science; Covariance; Inversion (geology); Metropolis–Hastings algorithm; Inverse problem; Posterior probability; Benchmark (surveying); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Artificial intelligence; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004178584,0.0006951894,0.0007923167,0.001258326,0.0005032308,0.001440351,0.001468887,0.001063304,0.001242026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01126552,0.0007667051,0.0007135981,0.001006554,0.002013757,0.003016539,0.001859198,0.00098623,0.0002998367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001096203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00140225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003411239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003277313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983075,0.0007048976,0.00006995451,0.0002179693,0.0006173408,0.00008235599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962614,0.002868728,0.0002399855,0.0003104743,0.0002701912,0.00004920604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006908412,0.00003753625,0.002307103,0.0001336453,0.0001026107,0.00007539261,0.0001458568,0.7227386,0.003825249,0.1882557,0.0005853447,0.08172386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001000245,0.00001613499,0.0003884608,0.00001700091,0.00001167775,0.00003900688,0.00001567626,0.9059346,0.001758896,0.0905358,0.00125582,0.00001704644],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003417905,0.0001439811,0.9957769,0.00007490125,0.0000101032,0.00001485271,0.00002042316,0.00007090245,0.0004700252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4468258,0.0009106125,0.5497828,0.0001589473,0.0001438773,0.0002181011,0.0002289534,0.0001598041,0.001571116],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004178584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02209872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05870292363193761,"score_gpt":0.2646342931487645,"score_spread":0.2059313695168269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}