{"id":"W2057016325","doi":"10.1007/s11061-009-9144-1","title":"The Naples Manuscript and the Case for a Female Readership","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neophilologus","topic":"Renaissance Literature and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Legend; Philology; Comparative literature; SAINT; Middle Ages; History; Literature; Agency (philosophy); Reception theory; Relevance (law); Historical linguistics; Comparative linguistics; Classics; Art; Linguistics; Sociology; Art history; Philosophy; Gender studies; Law; Feminism; Social science; Ancient history; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00339576,0.0004557801,0.0003209585,0.001569642,0.01756937,0.01268234,0.001473792,0.005989228,0.02070533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013405,0.0002381878,0.0003209604,0.0009483742,0.02230523,0.006157773,0.005764002,0.00670192,0.002917884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00525081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003916176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008714032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02034467,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972791,0.001231406,0.0000686276,0.000365309,0.0005399543,0.0005155994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942215,0.003259626,0.0003737499,0.00047274,0.0008527683,0.000819661],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004645391,0.00001622798,0.0004989853,0.0000745342,0.000005559956,0.00242435,0.06177974,0.00002670966,0.0001679704,0.7435197,0.1819902,0.009449542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000858945,0.00001458414,0.0006853563,0.0001815196,0.000005805298,0.001073173,0.03417177,0.0000402136,0.0002844766,0.02785524,0.9356617,0.00001736219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0253473,0.005990344,0.001154946,0.2584004,0.009019506,0.00003810484,0.00008079012,0.00007170118,0.6998969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4847943,0.002584743,0.0007725051,0.03284325,0.006374244,0.00008014582,0.0000435283,0.0002343387,0.472273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02070533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06926626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04551030661900561,"score_gpt":0.2395460406015738,"score_spread":0.1940357339825681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}