{"id":"W2057016325","doi":"10.1007/s11061-009-9144-1","title":"The Naples Manuscript and the Case for a Female Readership","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neophilologus","topic":"Renaissance Literature and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Legend; Philology; Comparative literature; SAINT; Middle Ages; History; Literature; Agency (philosophy); Reception theory; Relevance (law); Historical linguistics; Comparative linguistics; Classics; Art; Linguistics; Sociology; Art history; Philosophy; Gender studies; Law; Feminism; Social science; Ancient history; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001935653,0.0001077075,0.0001182847,0.00001162466,0.001129268,0.0004285067,0.0001266508,0.00004693859,0.00002695983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004068984,0.00004489365,0.00007271832,0.00001628871,0.0004657468,0.00008750393,0.00001034017,0.0001303087,0.000006687155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004195649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005451885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002958095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005132825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994528,0.00004319707,0.0001183379,0.0001394695,0.00005176391,0.0001944803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995128,0.0001731223,0.00004817625,0.0001865747,0.00005106945,0.00002824791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001675597,0.000009152823,0.000003130194,0.000007928131,0.00001731198,0.00004683755,0.02915602,1.437233e-7,0.000005264351,0.9149458,0.0494923,0.006148513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007419556,0.0001382665,0.00005506407,0.000012528,0.00003443165,0.0002584155,0.01109629,0.00001055878,0.00002085538,0.144172,0.8433681,0.00009145695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3184082,0.07999699,0.00002882052,0.2902254,0.002509236,0.002713409,0.0001276656,0.0003064092,0.3056839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790958,0.00006975778,0.00002624077,0.004444486,0.001201065,0.00004729631,0.000007369469,0.000006151578,0.0151019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7938758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8685528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04551030661900561,"score_gpt":0.2395460406015738,"score_spread":0.1940357339825681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}