{"id":"W2057021751","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1609.2012.00288.x","title":"Making evidence more wanted: a systematic review of facilitators to enhance the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; Context (archaeology); Data extraction; Grey literature; MEDLINE; Meta-analysis; Evidence-based medicine; Psychology; Relevance (law); Expediting; Evidence-based practice; Critical appraisal; Medicine; Medical education; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Political science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3535164,0.005199449,0.02398886,0.064835,0.00352239,0.01196334,0.006453869,0.005916452,0.006276659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5879639,0.005928588,0.02713753,0.0423701,0.004466431,0.02104781,0.01068205,0.00463236,0.001028235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01506827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04725439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003930171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01781484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.519207,0.272795,0.1562668,0.01014537,0.03912702,0.002458719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3533144,0.4855855,0.08508386,0.01690232,0.05601372,0.003100286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000469265,0.00003698358,0.00141506,0.9234886,0.01362303,0.000167058,0.002640692,0.0001843382,0.0003837594,0.0005575422,0.002017922,0.05501579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008454699,0.0002592289,0.002086875,0.9296345,0.05384805,0.0001755439,0.001140014,0.000265646,0.0004096756,0.001385991,0.009826052,0.0001229396],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.006968037,0.909426,0.0137935,0.007388378,0.001532243,0.05745627,0.001731558,0.0002673045,0.001436625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07415698,0.6320347,0.1535301,0.005849492,0.001031634,0.1311223,0.001384046,0.0001725193,0.0007183098],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6464836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7972294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9660526543247885,"score_gpt":0.6957228326553713,"score_spread":0.2703298216694172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}