{"id":"W2057032815","doi":"10.1002/1522-2683(200109)22:17<3699::aid-elps3699>3.0.co;2-a","title":"An evaluation of the detection limits possible for competitive capillary electrophoretic immunoassays","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electrophoresis","topic":"Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Detection limit; Capillary electrophoresis; Electrophoresis; Capillary action; Limit (mathematics); Chromatography; Immunoassay; Chemistry; Biological system; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Thermodynamics; Antibody; Mathematics; Physics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0108437,0.001508844,0.001179695,0.001126969,0.000815919,0.001981789,0.002690724,0.003277868,0.001197909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02410746,0.0009623817,0.0007687382,0.0008083101,0.001250521,0.001552813,0.001089174,0.001510849,0.000675471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001864859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001101934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001484043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001812694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880971,0.004294294,0.0004484324,0.001492216,0.005088344,0.0005796829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986767,0.0102575,0.0004347058,0.0004311076,0.001957641,0.0001521371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008667072,0.0001672837,0.002014036,0.001173958,0.0001083264,0.0002651129,0.000225348,0.00461896,0.9333484,0.008125997,0.0005488235,0.04853696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000289272,0.001117603,0.001334784,0.00008911436,0.00014981,0.0007736024,0.0000824056,0.01861701,0.9685968,0.001955771,0.007177955,0.00007618554],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3866984,0.07399537,0.5214581,0.002089723,0.00051644,0.000647186,0.0005143696,0.001065491,0.01301491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7294934,0.01409642,0.2509304,0.0006742014,0.0001575591,0.0007563469,0.0004959659,0.00009430329,0.003301463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0108437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0573476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01084541230148361,"score_gpt":0.234088887954175,"score_spread":0.2232434756526914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}