{"id":"W2057093129","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2008.05.004","title":"Promise and dismay: The state of strategic environmental assessment systems and practices in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada","keywords":"Strategic environmental assessment; Variety (cybernetics); Directive; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Maturity (psychological); Environmental impact assessment; Management science; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Environmental science; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03938129,0.0005350721,0.0009140313,0.006483765,0.008950398,0.01955024,0.005522161,0.00373815,0.002786985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05519198,0.00067273,0.0005774117,0.01335744,0.01014274,0.005104248,0.003695937,0.003447807,0.0003020107],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1679228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5246697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9887106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9651855,0.005124802,0.001558304,0.001684405,0.02288678,0.003560141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8986163,0.01434237,0.003321128,0.001801403,0.0740747,0.007844158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000170139,0.0001028757,0.01934965,0.004462227,0.0001837781,0.0003499663,0.008144525,0.006307295,0.0009684133,0.2143599,0.1798494,0.5657518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004178323,0.00009359521,0.04155967,0.005039722,0.0001873198,0.0002227171,0.01062114,0.002635166,0.0008609229,0.03027334,0.90822,0.0002446718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0386546,0.4293587,0.006014004,0.4150171,0.002117656,0.0001867918,0.001350658,0.0002944808,0.107006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6620992,0.2650885,0.01541514,0.03306936,0.0006257981,0.0001154005,0.0009653742,0.0001515703,0.02246966],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8320771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9650916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0355920713806966,"score_gpt":0.3298707094809276,"score_spread":0.294278638100231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}