{"id":"W2057138654","doi":"10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01748-5","title":"Prophylactic cranial irradiation revisited: cost-effectiveness and quality of life in small-cell lung cancer","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics","topic":"Lung Cancer Research Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Cancer Care Ontario; University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Cancer Agency","funders":"","keywords":"Conventional PCI; Medicine; Prophylactic cranial irradiation; Quality of life (healthcare); Surgery; Internal medicine; Lung cancer; Cost effectiveness; Toxicity; Retrospective cohort study; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001107305,0.000160895,0.0006672264,0.0002447625,0.00004385806,0.00001549417,0.0001883026,0.0001637724,0.00007148932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001166362,0.0001400249,0.0001267882,0.0002425588,0.0001849101,0.000221776,0.00006011134,0.0004890261,0.000003432381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001258872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004556019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002143823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003392157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978608,0.0005830033,0.0008250167,0.0002203717,0.0003059849,0.0002047527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996954,0.0008063532,0.001045785,0.0001141263,0.0009521447,0.0001276094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001106702,0.0005055043,0.9314643,0.0002792483,0.000383101,0.00001516719,0.0006556705,0.0003620559,0.008519358,0.001062376,0.0001811042,0.05546539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01547663,0.001155165,0.9726067,0.0002361174,0.0001777976,0.00002962597,0.00009047016,0.005913195,0.001628923,0.001000315,0.001484381,0.0002007147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.988035,0.006534019,0.001338713,0.002161165,0.0007232091,0.000726354,0.00005236171,0.00001321536,0.0004160288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943756,0.003746259,0.0003962937,0.0003352386,0.001040534,0.00004991276,0.00001299691,0.00001787436,0.00002528605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05526468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5710049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0632273612866845,"score_gpt":0.4132628435005799,"score_spread":0.3500354822138954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}