{"id":"W2057159029","doi":"10.1080/11926422.2004.9673359","title":"Most safely on the fence? A round table on the possibility of a Canadian foreign policy after 9/11","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Foreign Policy Journal","topic":"Economic Sanctions and International Relations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre for International Governance Innovation; University of Ottawa; Queen's University; University of Northern British Columbia; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fence (mathematics); Political science; Table (database); Foreign policy; International trade; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Law; Politics; Structural engineering; Database","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00968329,0.0006336204,0.0005872113,0.001162769,0.0534233,0.01592089,0.002116517,0.01059731,0.01549484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01292038,0.0005264891,0.0006321305,0.001754306,0.008658987,0.003922635,0.003736837,0.01283853,0.0009358542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1094735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1280062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9389681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9701115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9877321,0.002173099,0.0001600491,0.0009150202,0.004088886,0.004930939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909827,0.002083704,0.0002930838,0.0002283138,0.003186216,0.003225981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002721441,0.00005926335,0.003312784,0.0001967811,0.00002786846,0.00257291,0.1311508,0.0003440916,0.002174055,0.1077071,0.7315341,0.02064823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001798617,0.00002948317,0.002836582,0.0001975677,0.00001739557,0.00009955327,0.1654596,0.0001175126,0.0005978901,0.002518145,0.8279952,0.0001130782],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05563279,0.004835919,0.0005496875,0.7737191,0.009580746,0.0001560959,0.0003579719,0.00008012495,0.1550875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6917564,0.004361013,0.001603046,0.1324576,0.00135978,0.0001624535,0.0001920622,0.0002010463,0.1679068],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1094735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7942898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04231972781148732,"score_gpt":0.2279730058515645,"score_spread":0.1856532780400772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}