{"id":"W2057160780","doi":"10.1097/00043764-200107000-00002","title":"Workers??? Compensation Claims From Latex Glove Use","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Workers' compensation; Occupational medicine; Public health; Occupational safety and health; West virginia; Occupational exposure; Environmental health; Unit (ring theory); Medicine; Medical examiner; Family medicine; Compensation (psychology); Gerontology; Political science; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Psychology; Geography; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001705678,0.0003052028,0.0006623783,0.0007006457,0.002432245,0.001503118,0.0006221682,0.01577799,0.0108207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01235266,0.0004033623,0.0005139165,0.000568681,0.0004464647,0.0009119453,0.0006793669,0.003764355,0.004806747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002213129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001475312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01303062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0312187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984823,0.0002745026,0.0002345081,0.0001500527,0.0003643459,0.0004943818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950802,0.002017233,0.0007932453,0.0001905083,0.001089426,0.0008293911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002180405,0.00009360712,0.02411165,0.00009325918,0.00002085835,0.003725239,0.0003581654,0.00009206172,0.000400026,0.001904051,0.952684,0.01629887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005714468,0.0003488254,0.2635946,0.0008629018,0.0001364442,0.009506745,0.002316791,0.002103795,0.001290095,0.006456281,0.7126678,0.0001442715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.03355461,0.001866923,0.0002149156,0.8830044,0.009871799,0.00007471773,0.002536739,0.0001085055,0.06876737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2345835,0.002660573,0.0001882191,0.5967754,0.02604689,0.0001098222,0.001376279,0.00004184563,0.1382176],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01577799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03619891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1045852362390846,"score_gpt":0.2848355416102437,"score_spread":0.1802503053711591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}