{"id":"W2057183536","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2004.07.027","title":"Mercury assessment and evaluation of its impact on fish in the Cecina river basin (Tuscany, Italy)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Pollution","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Council Canada","keywords":"Mercury (programming language); Leuciscus; Tributary; Environmental science; Structural basin; Mercury contamination; Environmental chemistry; Contamination; Confluence; Drainage basin; Main river; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Hydrology (agriculture); Fishery; Ecology; Geology; Geography; Biology; Chemistry; Geomorphology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004529436,0.00048014,0.0004058442,0.001039705,0.0006554321,0.0005865697,0.0004620071,0.0007952876,0.0005096916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003660026,0.000201274,0.0004394429,0.001055547,0.0007241736,0.0002545718,0.0005730347,0.0001971536,0.0001098615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002541399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001412825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2181631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997008,0.00007793863,0.00001412893,0.00006354495,0.00008584646,0.00005773135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998695,0.00002829485,0.0000304045,0.00001386064,0.00004005892,0.00001797532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003099472,0.0005760187,0.7963237,0.0006501988,0.0007330317,0.001977335,0.002018395,0.03288407,0.1038942,0.0005821623,0.001327372,0.05593408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006772522,0.0009635348,0.9822063,0.00002221892,0.0001390224,0.0001673806,0.0005035388,0.004283134,0.009144419,0.0001163269,0.002368451,0.00001785032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989983,0.0001335201,0.00006912233,0.00003221229,0.000002070817,0.00001055056,0.0001202388,0.000004438605,0.0006295131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983938,0.0001743458,0.0003511302,0.00001812868,0.000003788443,0.00002012976,0.0001899356,0.000003457746,0.0008452507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.19489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3875111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02239568490606327,"score_gpt":0.3131592165714854,"score_spread":0.2907635316654221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}