{"id":"W2057183536","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2004.07.027","title":"Mercury assessment and evaluation of its impact on fish in the Cecina river basin (Tuscany, Italy)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Pollution","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Council Canada","keywords":"Mercury (programming language); Leuciscus; Tributary; Environmental science; Structural basin; Mercury contamination; Environmental chemistry; Contamination; Confluence; Drainage basin; Main river; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Hydrology (agriculture); Fishery; Ecology; Geology; Geography; Biology; Chemistry; Geomorphology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000839597,0.0001477204,0.0001308913,0.00004810791,0.0001160429,0.00001178004,0.00009417513,0.00004748956,0.000706625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001812789,0.0001033772,0.00005462102,0.0001278933,0.0002438227,0.0002691011,0.00006465502,0.0001081832,0.00007557779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009534137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001448555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002401606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004813784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984657,0.0001855026,0.0002080713,0.0002115863,0.0007416604,0.000187433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996461,0.00003178092,0.0001033127,0.0001671839,0.00000192371,0.0000496719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002111526,0.002467443,0.6311459,0.00003011698,0.0001450072,0.00001242921,0.01900206,0.07438109,0.1798519,0.000929249,0.003886692,0.087937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009307222,0.0001990984,0.993836,0.00001744623,0.00003752766,0.000005871879,0.0006763753,0.0003384442,0.003090024,0.0006160573,0.0001430708,0.0001093489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946628,0.00008438123,0.00002276547,0.0009939745,0.00004893959,0.0004722528,0.00005531613,0.000005874558,0.003653667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992774,0.000143303,0.00005683842,0.0004203519,0.00001911557,0.00002766912,0.00002097805,0.000007334972,0.00002701463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3626901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7737048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02239568490606327,"score_gpt":0.3131592165714854,"score_spread":0.2907635316654221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}