{"id":"W2057206087","doi":"10.1139/z01-129","title":"An evaluation of territory mapping to estimate fisher density","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Territoriality; Mark and recapture; Population density; Population; Population size; Geography; Biology; Statistics; Ecology; Demography; Physical geography; Cartography; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01028546,0.0005371376,0.0003120185,0.001346627,0.0002797209,0.0004418392,0.0006948019,0.0003477356,0.0007764713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02618536,0.0002541377,0.0002646768,0.000956667,0.0002269914,0.00100965,0.00051927,0.0002055467,0.0002034958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004586168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003364448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006611192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0135666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930254,0.00507874,0.000220248,0.0004231842,0.00110317,0.0001492053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743191,0.01768579,0.00200031,0.001362309,0.004293458,0.0003391156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006403389,0.0002653699,0.7566643,0.0001666711,0.0001649859,0.0001074489,0.0009740805,0.005679508,0.003467631,0.0004415008,0.0006190419,0.2308091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001026479,0.002926291,0.8727034,0.00009586196,0.0002534123,0.0005469616,0.001054855,0.1123304,0.007096368,0.0003874066,0.002429183,0.00007327749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766505,0.0004300955,0.0195234,0.0000982681,0.00002188221,0.0001521385,0.0002399829,0.0001174174,0.002766379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645368,0.0002450636,0.03397323,0.00002840656,0.00002381726,0.0001631193,0.000310033,0.0000207206,0.0006987307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01028546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05439538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0282419718743157,"score_gpt":0.2612141653246157,"score_spread":0.2329721934503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}