{"id":"W2057264385","doi":"10.1007/s11192-013-1171-9","title":"An overview of forestry journals in the period 2006–2010 as basis for ascertaining research trends","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Biological Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Ordination; Ecophysiology; Forest management; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Plant ecology; Plant science; Forest ecology; Biology; Forestry; Geography; Botany; Ecosystem","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006208111,0.0007126742,0.0008390094,0.1506134,0.001001392,0.00370226,0.0007779763,0.0007543097,0.004979547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02234986,0.0004194955,0.001124094,0.1734529,0.0005582168,0.003435984,0.001860755,0.000748045,0.001810076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002490293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006861723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01318654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03344174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911069,0.001055067,0.004129421,0.0008082265,0.00222404,0.0006762813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9148415,0.02021016,0.02997428,0.00180581,0.02762425,0.005543943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008481674,0.0002876585,0.5102443,0.02765116,0.001074781,0.0008934161,0.00486023,0.0008502743,0.007696782,0.005723877,0.09797585,0.3418936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001482983,0.0001187153,0.8177553,0.003476418,0.0003056549,0.0008633037,0.002196599,0.0002681533,0.0008828582,0.0004078704,0.1736649,0.0000453855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3134368,0.2969919,0.002557003,0.007464006,0.001619489,0.0007806107,0.3366912,0.0007151245,0.03974373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4681559,0.2362546,0.020108,0.001995949,0.002117703,0.001290238,0.2583743,0.0002947449,0.01140859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03283203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1892962841462507,"score_gpt":0.439347514978242,"score_spread":0.2500512308319913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}