{"id":"W2057423554","doi":"10.1162/isec.2008.33.1.139","title":"Divining Nuclear Intentions: A Review Essay","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Security","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Nuclear proliferation; Nuclear weapon; Political science; Foreign policy; Relevance (law); Positive economics; Rationality; Politics; State (computer science); Identity (music); International relations; Nuclear energy policy; Perspective (graphical); Political economy; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005794104,0.0002987522,0.0007627091,0.0003210288,0.0005614712,0.0001294139,0.001143599,0.0003081056,0.003524978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001681678,0.0002802275,0.000904608,0.0003995798,0.0002759801,0.0003562802,0.0002138319,0.0006185804,0.001303881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001176017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009280125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005354412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001154918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969134,0.0003177784,0.0007836834,0.0004040065,0.001262287,0.0003188752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982322,0.0002969938,0.0005536557,0.000256628,0.0005105106,0.0001499838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.063937e-7,0.00007261465,0.000002130595,0.001058942,0.000206328,0.00001909447,0.0009302403,8.757493e-8,3.4126e-9,0.7449518,0.02581759,0.2269403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005515446,0.000007287642,0.000001473504,0.0219185,0.0001174434,0.00005674686,0.00004341776,0.000007485115,4.214351e-9,0.008820002,0.9687104,0.0002621209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[1.368353e-7,0.5786197,0.00001598264,0.0003150351,0.0005192065,0.0003315313,0.00009600421,0.00007369956,0.4200287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00007258495,0.9933174,0.00009856533,0.0005488937,0.001211341,0.0001079959,0.0002347912,0.00004359062,0.004364783],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9428928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06217098059270012,"score_gpt":0.4251668665605442,"score_spread":0.3629958859678441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}