{"id":"W2057504278","doi":"10.1007/s13280-014-0577-9","title":"Effects of a major municipal effluent on the St. Lawrence River: A case study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"AMBIO","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Johnson and Johnson; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Effluent; Bioaccumulation; Environmental science; Sewage treatment; Aquatic ecosystem; Sewage; Wastewater; Invertebrate; Environmental impact assessment; Water resource management; Environmental protection; Environmental engineering; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007963656,0.0007213544,0.00102996,0.001230718,0.0005820933,0.001287491,0.0008678238,0.001371109,0.001564654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005265591,0.000205912,0.0008296773,0.00209133,0.0003965544,0.0004574696,0.0006846384,0.0006156599,0.0002704792],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001193662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003436854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02085633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08532636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999561,0.0001061553,0.00004633138,0.00004005004,0.000176717,0.00006971733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996703,0.0001055678,0.0001073341,0.000007259384,0.00008989436,0.00001974408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002615468,0.0004991516,0.00388865,0.07527615,0.0005784613,0.004805323,0.000923763,0.003756829,0.009784108,0.004999884,0.01719493,0.8780312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006931965,0.001962924,0.0288809,0.02069077,0.002078137,0.009119994,0.004094736,0.001026217,0.01523207,0.002048284,0.9146593,0.0001374191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01873468,0.9720092,0.0002412873,0.001158204,0.0001136664,0.00004120018,0.0001103921,0.00001154361,0.007579706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04449086,0.9524305,0.0004422622,0.0003028304,0.00005018074,0.00001522819,0.00005358703,0.000002087694,0.00221246],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9791437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04146987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0442294105247334,"score_gpt":0.3407080548844348,"score_spread":0.2964786443597014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}