{"id":"W2057684442","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2435.2001.00490-2.x","title":"An adjustment of the extended contingency model of Farnsworth & Illius (1998)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Functional Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Predation; Biology; Functional response; Ecology; Optimal foraging theory; Metabolic rate; Herbivore; Behavioral ecology; Predator","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001673954,0.00006951956,0.000113994,0.00001545784,0.00009104308,0.000001016436,0.0001463314,0.00009264782,0.002632468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003675028,0.000053883,0.00005171847,0.0001183816,0.000227048,0.00008488211,0.00006604382,0.00007882934,0.0001003502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005060666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004218458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006405566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002248117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992657,0.00007206913,0.0002227943,0.0001680452,0.0001322815,0.0001390568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995279,0.00006098155,0.0001573536,0.0002057835,0.00001807619,0.00002991818],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000616542,0.0002921584,0.9491271,0.000001787348,0.00001729473,2.202719e-7,0.00007636635,0.04396395,0.002002433,0.00148456,0.001917884,0.00105461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002406165,0.00009577697,0.9858145,0.00000117873,0.00002189462,0.000006919549,0.00002335587,0.008587218,0.00006115467,0.003908771,0.001187399,0.00005119441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943733,0.000013667,0.001279129,0.000465115,0.0004517075,0.0001364553,0.000006940557,0.00001045964,0.003263256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968274,0.00001094784,0.0004905966,0.0008104543,0.00003608268,0.00002591029,0.00001399374,0.000004373803,0.001780294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03668744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02233497106468221,"score_gpt":0.2250061247169935,"score_spread":0.2026711536523113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}