{"id":"W2057693135","doi":"10.1088/0957-0233/26/5/055601","title":"A comparison of magnetic resonance methods for spatially resolved<i>T</i><sub>2</sub>distribution measurements in porous media","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Measurement Science and Technology","topic":"NMR spectroscopy and applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Saudi Aramco","keywords":"Adiabatic process; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Spin echo; Computational physics; Materials science; Physics; Porous medium; Optics; Magnetic resonance imaging; Porosity; Thermodynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004407838,0.001097119,0.0009447082,0.002353768,0.0003685406,0.001068149,0.001272239,0.00137756,0.001383795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008092249,0.0006722343,0.0006306968,0.001811939,0.0005756746,0.001827642,0.0008868513,0.001122717,0.0008024329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005675966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005432853,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007189685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008081321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963216,0.0008267837,0.0001813615,0.0005613888,0.001971786,0.0001370238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955747,0.002287695,0.0004488215,0.0004011408,0.001176499,0.0001110733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002393491,0.0002166925,0.003749761,0.00448991,0.0004189523,0.0004388125,0.0004662163,0.002782183,0.5796042,0.006760938,0.003863738,0.3948151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002177614,0.003147803,0.03120536,0.001064092,0.0009989529,0.006370265,0.0006226575,0.04864753,0.7946076,0.004728497,0.1078385,0.0005509479],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.170015,0.2006722,0.598228,0.001675608,0.001790234,0.0006480003,0.001185583,0.00336701,0.0224183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3423306,0.07249153,0.5749298,0.0008149627,0.0005758952,0.0008973246,0.0008573239,0.0007552744,0.006347345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004407838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02331114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07129743691783533,"score_gpt":0.3870049762043712,"score_spread":0.3157075392865358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}